articles


Ibbaanika & Craig ROCK! May your family be soon reunited!!

http://www.theadoptionshow.com/home2.php

McCain Responses:

McCain’s Response:

I will be glad to examine your situation. Yes I strongly believe in adoption. I am a great believer in adoption. Those of us who are strong pro life people also believe that We should make adoption available in every way possible for young women who face a very very tough situation in their lives. All I can say is I would like to look at your situation and help you in whatever way possible. And I will continue my advocacy for the unborn and the born. I’ll look at the case and see what I can ascertain.

When Ibbaanika mentioned he did not really address her question…. What about the corruption? What will you do for natural families?

He states:

All I can tell you is I have supported faith based programs. I support adoption. I support fast track adoptions. I would have to know your particular case… but I support adoption.

SO MUCH FOR SUPPORTING FAMILIES AND FAMILY VALUES MR. MCCAIN!!!! YOU’VE JUST ENDED THE LIE OF THIS REPUBLICAN LEGACY!!!

Missouri News:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQIa2ghehxQ&feature=related

I saw Family Preservation’s entry and I’m not giving up on you, Michael Moore, without an email.

(revised)

Dear Michael Moore,

I’ve been a great admirer of your work from the time I watched Roger & Me, all the way to Sicko. You have done great work in exposing the ills of corporations, the loss of ma and pop shops, the gruesome horrors of the Bush Administration, the current medical insurance institution, and so much more.

I know that you are an intelligent person, and we can’t all know everything there is to know… because there are so many things out there, and so much propaganda.

Your recent comments supporting Madonna and her adoption sound to me as though you do not understand the great depths of the entitlement that privileged people feel to save others. Nor do you appear to understand the billions of dollars that are made by adoption lawyers and agencies to steal them from mothers who are medicated in the hospital, in maternity homes, off their porches, out of their wombs, or who interrogate them until they sign papers giving up their rights, or who will terminate their rights without them signing anything.

See CRIN website regarding the letters from the human rights of Malawi to Madonna

The history of adoption and how it became corrupted (to literally give agencies the power to steal children off of the doorsteps of the poor) can be seen in the book, “The Baby Thief, the untold story of Georgia Tann, the Baby Seller Who Corrupted adoption” written by Barbara Raymond, (as well as many other sources*) an adoptive mother. This isn’t just about stealing babies, its also about how agencies are tied to lawyers and judges and politicians, making illegal acts untouchable by justice seeking persons. Georgia Tann exploited babies, many of whom died, by stealing and putting them in her orphanage, and selling them to people. She also took pictures of them and placed them as ads in newspapers with some pretty atrocious catch lines that would make any person who was adopted puke. It also shows some of the very corrupt practices that greedy politicians use to control their city, from allowing crime by punishing them with fines, to shunning people who challenged them, sometimes with death, all of which had no justice.

But make no mistake, these are crimes not done just in the past… but all of which are still done today. Many mothers and fathers have challenged the adoption system begging, pleading to be reunited with their children, fighting for years and years to get them back, and continue to fail.

Rachel Sullivan, Allison Quets (allisonquets.com), Janette, Angele & John, Meg,

Karl Hindle (who is from the UK, but the mother moved to Florida and their child is placed, also has some medical connections) http://emilyrosehindle.blogspot.com/

Craig and Ibbaanika Bond
http://www.nbcactionnews.com/content/investigative/story.aspx?content_id=ef45e63e-7fbd-462d-8554-30aa793a80cf

Stephanie Bennett
http://sendevelynhome.com/default.aspx

Adrian Zane’s parents:
http://www.fightforadrian.com/page5.html

the mother of Amber James http://heatherrainbow.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/amber-james-update/

Cody and Ashley
http://www.babyselling.com/

These are just people that I know and have contact with. Many are still fighting. There has never been an investigation. Because it goes up, all the way to the top…. George and Laura Bush are on the Board of Directors of the most profitable adoption agency in the country, the Gladney Center, in Texas. The former Michigan adoption agency director now in charge of the health care of Iraqi citizens…. be prepared to see Iraqi orphans and infants on the US adoption market.

Put in by the Bush Admin:
See Democracy Now article:

Jim Haveman does not have a medical degree. He was a social worker, and he was the former Director of Community Health in the State of Michigan. Prior to his stint in government, he had a little bit of international experience, but it was largely in the context of being a director for International Aid, a faith-based relief organization that promotes Christianity in the developing world in conjunction with development assistance. And prior to that, he headed up a large adoption agency in the State of Michigan that urges pregnant women not to have abortions.

Please, please please… do some research. Contact some of these people. And at the very least, understand that we criticize Madonna, because she has violated Malawiian law, and that that child is now losing his parents, his country, his language, his culture, all because he was poor. Maybe Madonna even had good intentions, but the act was wrong, nonetheless. We should be supporting poor families, not punishing them for being poor and/or vulnerable.

In Peace,
Heather

http://www.amazon.com/Stork-Market-Americas-Multi-Billion-Unregulated/dp/1427608954
http://www.crin.org/resources/infoDetail.asp?ID=10705&flag=news
Babies ‘removed to meet targets’
By Brian Wheeler
http://womenshealthnews.blogspot.com/2007/01/pregnant-teens-escape-so-does.html
http://caica.org/New_Hope_Maternity_Home_teens_escape_1-20-07.htm

Regina McKnight — Victory at Long Last

Today, we were thrilled to learn that after 8 long years, the South Carolina Supreme Court has finally reversed the 20-Year Homicide Conviction of Regina McKnight. The unanimous decision recognizes that research linking cocaine to stillbirths is based on “outdated” and inaccurate medical information. NAPW has been working on behalf of Ms. McKnight for nearly 10 years.

Specifically the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Regina McKnight did not have a fair trial when she was convicted in 2001 for homicide by child abuse. Through this conviction she became the first woman in South Carolina to be convicted of homicide by child abuse as a result of suffering an unintentional stillbirth.

McKnight was arrested in 1999, several months after she experienced a stillbirth at Conway Hospital. McKnight’s conviction was based on the jury’s acceptance of the scientifically unsupported claim that her cocaine use caused the stillbirth. McKnight had no prior arrest history and even prosecutors agreed that she had no intention of harming the fetus or losing the pregnancy. Nevertheless, upon conviction she was given a twenty-year sentence, suspended to twelve years in prison with no chance for parole. She was projected to be released in 2010.

The medical community has strongly opposed McKnight’s prosecution and conviction. From the beginning, leading South Carolina and national medical, public health, and child welfare organizations and experts have opposed the prosecution and conviction. These organizations—represented by us– the National Advocates for Pregnant Women and the Drug Policy Alliance, with South Carolina counsel Susan Dunn included the South Carolina Medical Association, the South Carolina Nurses Association, the South Carolina Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors, and the South Carolina Coalition for Healthy Families argued in an amicus (friend of the court) brief argued that women do not lose their rights to a fair trial upon becoming pregnant and challenged the state’s evidence that cocaine use or anything else that McKnight did or did not do caused the stillbirth.

In 2002 NAPW with numerous allies challenged the constitutionality of using homicide statutes to prosecute women who experience stillbirths. On appeal, a bare majority of the State Supreme Court upheld the conviction and the new interpretation of the state’s homicide law. The Court held that a pregnant woman who unintentionally heightens the risk of a stillbirth could be found guilty of “extreme indifference to human life” homicide. Under this decision a conviction for homicide is permitted on any evidence that a pregnant woman engaged in activity “public[ly] know[n]” to be “potentially fatal” to a fetus. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the decision.

Today’s ruling focused on the question of whether Ms. McKnight received a fair trial and concluded that Ms. McKnight’s counsel was “ineffective in her preparation of McKnight’s defense through expert testimony and cross-examination.” The decision also indicated that the medical and scientific basis for her prosecution and that of other women in the state is based on outdated and inaccurate medical information.

“Significantly, the opinion acknowledges that current research simply does not support the assumption that prenatal exposure to cocaine results in harm to the fetus, and the opinion makes clear that it is certainly ‘no more harmful to a fetus than nicotine use, poor nutrition, lack of prenatal care, or other conditions commonly associated with the urban poor.’” said Susan K. Dunn, South Carolina co-counsel for amicus. “This decision puts Solicitors [prosecutors] across the state on notice that they must actually prove that an illegal drug has risked or caused harm—not simply rely on prejudice and medical misinformation.”

This ruling addressed a petition filed on behalf of McKnight seeking a judicial review to determine whether the person is imprisoned lawfully or should be released from custody. The petition must show that the court ordered the imprisonment based on a legal or factual error. In McKnight, the factual error was accepting a causal link between McKnight’s cocaine use and her stillbirth. The Court held that the legal errors were not calling medical expert as witnesses who could refute that link, failing to investigate the medical evidence the state’s witnesses relied on and that was based on outdated scientific studies, and failing to challenge the court’s confusing and contradictory explanations to the jury of what “intent” Ms. McKnight had to have.

“Ms. McKnight is one of more than 500 women in South Carolina who experience stillbirths each year, and in many of those cases, medicine just can’t determine the cause,” said Brandi Parrish, coordinator of the South Carolina Coalition for Healthy Families and NAPW local ally. “It is a tragedy that Ms. McKnight has been in prison for nearly eight years for a crime she did not commit. Families in South Carolina are not helped by treating stillbirths as crimes and wasting hundreds of thousands of tax dollars to imprison innocent mothers.”

The medical and public health groups also raised concerns about the consequences of South Carolina’s policy of arresting pregnant women who experience drug problems. In their brief, they cited the fact that threatening pregnant women with jail time deters them from seeking prenatal care and other vital services, as has been the case in South Carolina since the Whitner ruling in 1997 that originally permitted prosecution of pregnant women under state child endangerment charges.

Ms. McKnight is represented on the petition by C. Rauch Wise of the American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina Foundation, Inc., and Matthew Hersh and Julie Carpenter of the law firm Jenner & Block for the DKT Liberty Project.

Posted by wen on May 12, 2008 03:14 PM

Origins-USA.org announces it’s
Mothers’ Stories Project

Origins-USA launched the Mothers’ Stories Project to gather stories of mothers who lost children to adoption. If you are a mother who lost a child to adoption or had her parental rights terminated, we invite you to SHARE YOUR STORY! The stories will be posted on the Origins-USA website, and may be disseminated in a book, video, and/or other format. The project will help other mothers know they are not alone and help the public to understand how the loss of a child affects women and why we need alternatives to adoption. We will also use it to build our database of mothers from around the country who are willing to be contacted by journalists and share their stories in the media. Mothers living outside the United States are also encouraged to share their stories!

SHARE YOUR STORY IN YOUR OWN WORDS!

* To share your story, please complete the form that can be accessed from the Origins-USA HOMEPAGE “Mothers’ Stories” LINK.

* You will be given the opportunity to review and approve or disapprove any edits to your story.

* Please feel free to forward this announcement to all list and groups fr mothers who have lost children to adoption.

* If you have any questions, contact us at info@origins-usa.org

Thanks Robin for this blog entry update

It is my opinion that Wake County CPS, the Children’s Home Society, as well as Johnston County should be held responsible for the death of Sean Ford / Paddock. The Children’s Home Society as well as Wake County saw signs of abuse and neglect and failed to act on them. They both referred to people outside of themselves to shirk responsibility for their failed adoption experiment. This resulted in the abuse of several children, and the result of Sean’s death. In the medical world, a doctor would lose his license if he neglected a patient. These are serious injustices. How many more children will have to die before any of these parties are held accountable?

http://www.nationalcpsrallies.co.nr/

March 6, 2006 (HTML view)
PDF Format

Wake County Department of Human Services
220 Swinburne Street
Raleigh, NC 27620
Statement by Warren Ludwig, Director of Child Welfare Services with Wake County
Human Services

Re: Child Protective Services Involvement with Sean (Ford) Paddock

Children’s Home Society provided a detailed adoptive home study.

…On January 26, 2005, Wake County CPS received information about possible maltreatment of Sean, then age 3, on a visit the previous weekend to the prospective adoptive home. The supervising social worker asked for more detailed information. The information available on January 26 was screened as not sufficient to constitute a report for investigation. On January 27, additional information was received and was screened as a report of neglect–improper discipline….

…In early February, the decision was made to resume visits between the children and the Paddocks with the condition that the Children’s Home Society worker be present during the visits. A Wake County social worker and the guardian ad litem also attended the first visit, which occurred February 10, 2005…

…On March 9, Johnston County gave Wake County a verbal summary of their completed assessment. They found no evidence to support the allegations and were making a finding of no services needed for the Paddock children….

Ok, I went ahead and looked up the name of this bill, and it really is called this. Insanity. Doesn’t this give some indication that what is happening is that babies and being bought and sold? And we all know that in this capitalist society, that wherever there is money to be made, there are people willing to go to extreme means to snatch the product in whatever way necessary. ie, coercion and kidnapping. With that being said, HELLO! Child Trafficking is ILLEGAL. The Buying and Selling of human beings is IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, and ILLEGAL! Let’s stop this horrible situation, and do some service for our people and the children, let’s end profiteering of babies, and get rid of these barbaric adoption laws which only serve to protect the lawyers, agencies and judges.

The Texas Baby Purchasing Act of 2007
Full Article
Sen. Dan Patrick has figured out that adoption tax credits have a serious limitation: they don’t do anything at all to increase the number of newborn babies available for adoption in the first place. But Senator Dan’s the man with a plan to even out the shortfall.

Under Patrick’s SB 1567, AKA the Texas Baby Purchasing Act of 2007, women would qualify for a $500 payment from the state within 60 days of signing away all parental rights to their newborn children.

If Patrick gets his way, childbearing in the service of the state won’t be just some creepy Handmaid’s Tale fiction anymore. How’s that for some Republican family values?

myspace friends of Noah

Video

Full Story
Reported by: Keith King
Email: king@nbcactionnews.com
Last Update: 5/10 3:47 pm
Related Links

* Supreme Court Ruling

A metro man is in the middle of a bitter battle to raise his son.

An NBC Action News Investigation reveals that his fight could have a huge impact on other fathers and adoptions.

At the center of the battle is a child unaware that his biological father has been fighting the system to keep him from being adopted by someone else.

Like a proud dad, Craig Lentz shows off his son’s room to NBC Action News Investigator Keith King.

“We’re just keeping everything for him until he comes home,” Lentz said.

Since shortly after birth, Lentz has not been able to be part of his son’s life. “When he has parents that love him and want him, it’s ridiculous that a third party can come and take him away,” Lentz said.

Like many contested adoptions, the details are confusing, the legal battle is expensive and the feelings are bitter.

Lentz was there when his son was born in Dec. 2004. He and girlfriend Ibbaanika lived in different cities.

Lentz says the plan was for him to eventually reunite with Ibbaanika and his son in Kansas City.

But by February, just two months after his son’s birth, the young, unwed mother, too afraid to tell her family, made the painful decision to cut her parental rights. She agreed to give the baby up for adoption, against Lentz’ wishes.

“I had second thoughts on my own. He never agreed with it at all, from the very beginning, he was always against it,” Ibbaanika said

Lentz’ name was not on the birth certificate. He wanted proof, and a DNA test eventually showed he was the father. But that proof came too late and the adoption wheels were already in motion.

“I thought what I had done was a mistake. I was sorry. I never meant for things to be that way,” Ibbaanika said.

Court documents show Lentz filed a motion to intervene, and stop the adoption. But the Jackson County Family Court ruled that Lentz had not complied with the state’s requirements and therefore his consent was not necessary. The court then signed off on the adoption.

In Missouri, unmarried fathers have to place their name on the child’s birth certificate or go to court to establish their paternity. And they have to do it fast.

According to a little known state law, fathers have only 15 DAYS to do it, or risk losing their child.

“I was surprised. I thought that was not enough time,” State Rep. Leonard Hughes said.

Rep. Hughes, of Kansas City, says the 15 day rule affects unmarried dads all across the state. “And what’s best for that child is giving the time so everyone can go through thorough tests and thorough processes so everything is accounted for,” Rep. Hughes said.

Lentz appealed the family court’s decision all the way up to the Missouri Supreme Court.

His case brought an unexpected response. The court ruled unanimously that despite the 15 day rule, putative fathers can still challenge the adoption or termination of their rights in a timely manner.

It was a huge victory for Lentz but a short lived celebration. “And the Supreme Court said I did everything in a timely manner like I was supposed to do,” Lentz said.

The case went back to the Jackson County family court where a judge allowed supervised visits between Lentz and his son during the lengthy legal battles.

But last December, despite the Missouri Supreme Court’s ruling, the Jackson County Family Court still allowed another family to adopt the child, arguing that Lentz did not act fast enough.

“If I didn’t pay child support, I would be forced to go to the state penitentiary. Now I want to take responsibility for this child and they are telling me that I can’t,” Lentz said.

Now, Rep. Hughes wants to change the law. Instead of 15 days, he wants dads to have up to 60 days to claim their paternity.

That won’t help Craig Lentz. His battle to gain custody of his son continues in court. “We love him and we did everything we could to bring him home,” Lentz said.

When asked why he is speaking out now, Lentz said “This is what’s right for my child.”

The legal battle is not over. Lentz’ attorney is appealing the case back to the Missouri Supreme Court to appeal the lower court’s decision to let the adoption go through.

The family court judge told NBC Action News she cannot speak about the issue sinc the case is on appeal.

The child is now 3-years-old and living with the adoptive family.

So, the neat things about seeing what people search, is that it reminds me of some of the things that I have written in the past.

ohhh look! I’m so glad you found me by searching
heatherrainbow heather rainbow (my loyal visitors from Jacksonville Fl, ie Shorstein country)

florida adoption situations
I’m here. Ask if you need anything. I know lots of people in Florida Adoption Situations. Ask away.

samuel “buddy” shorstein florida
Oh yeah. I remember when I did research on this person. See posts: Shorstein Posts. Look under The Shorstein Family.

kate and gerry mccann and madeleine mccann
I hope that she is found safe soon. I hope you found my article, and were able to find the Mccann site.

angela jackson
Sorry! I’ve been slowly putting all of my posts back up. I had this article in my unpublished categories. It is published now. Here is the details of that story: Angela Jackson recovers two sons abducted to Texas from Scotland

“rose firestein” new york
I hope you were able to find my post: Children’s Rights Joins Statewide Class Action Lawsuit , of which Rose Firestein is a part. Also be sure to check their web site: Children’s Rights as they are a national organization.

shorstein and shorstein

Maybe you are looking for the accountants? There are a whole shlew of shorsteins in the business of Law and Accounting. See posts: Shorstein Posts. I hadn’t realized this wasn’t in my category lists. I updated it just for you. Look under the Shorstein Family.

michale shorstein adoption fl

See previous. But, it is Michael Shorstein. If ANYONE Ever visits here, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, if you want to find out more about Michael Shorstein, leave a message. I know lots of people fighting him. Leave me a message. I will not publish it, but I promise to respond.

one family left in vietnam 2008 waiting

I am not sure what the family in Vietnam was waiting for. If it had to do with adopting a child, I hope that the family was able to stay together. See Sume’s blog regarding how it feels to be adopted from Vietnam.

gladney adoption lawsuit

Yeah. We all would love to have lawsuits against the agencies who stole us or who coerced us. I hope you find a lawyer to take your case. I’m not sure of any lawsuits pending against Gladney. But don’t ever give up. I know there are protests against Gladney every year. I’d suggest going to that and seeing if you can find people who have started a lawsuit. I’m sure it wouldn’t be in the papers if it were. Agencies and lawyers have a tight grip on media. If you find out anything, feel free to stop by and leave a note. I’d be happy to publish it. Also, there was recently an article of a woman, Maria Barragan who was kidnapped from Argentina, who pressed charges against the lawyer and kidnappers (abductive parents) and they were put in jail.

Find Madeleine
Message from Gerry and Kate

Our daughter Madeleine was abducted on 3rd May 2007 in Praia da Luz, Portugal, 9 days before her 4th birthday. She was taken from our holiday apartment where she was sleeping with her younger brother and sister whilst we were dining 50 yards away. Despite a massive investigation led by the Portuguese police and supported by the British police, we still do not know who has taken her, why she was taken or where she is. In addition, private investigators based in Spain are now following up any leads regarding Madeleine’s disappearance. (Investigation page)

Since Madeleine’s abduction, we have learned a lot about missing children and child exploitation. The scale of the problem is massive and worldwide. Although finding Madeleine will always remain our priority, we feel it is our duty to highlight these problems as well as areas where legislation can be improved, in order to make the world a little safer for all children. To achieve these aims we are working closely with the International Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the Centre for Child Exploitation and Online Protection and other non-governmental agencies throughout Europe (Investigation page). The Find Madeleine Campaign launched a new YouTube channel for missing children in August 2007 called ‘Don’t You Forget About Me’ in conjunction with ICMEC and Google.

The support we have had from around the world has been amazing. We have no doubt that without all the good wishes, prayers and efforts of so many people, our ordeal would have been so much harder. It has helped maintain our strength and hope, and this together with support for the campaign, has helped the search for our precious Madeleine. We would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone for their unconditional support and solidarity.

Madeleine is a beautiful little person. She was a very happy and much loved little girl. We believe there is a very good chance that Madeleine is still alive. She deserves the love and security of her family. She needs to be back home with her mummy and daddy, brother and sister.

Please keep Madeleine in your thoughts and prayers. And please – remain vigilant.

We will NEVER give up looking for Madeleine.

Thank you again for your ongoing support and kindness.

Adopted Children Immigrant Visa Unit
Summary of Irregularities in Adoptions in Vietnam
http://vietnam.usembassy.gov/irreg_adoptions042508.html

On October 25, 2007 in response to “growing concerns about
irregularities in the methods used to identify children for adoption
in Vietnam and the resulting difficulties in classifying those
children as orphans,” USCIS required that I-600 petitions be filed in
Ho Chi Minh City, with the processing of these petitions to be
completed before prospective adoptive parents travel to Vietnam. These
procedures enable USCIS to determine whether a child qualifies as an
orphan, as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act. In the six
months since this program was instituted, US officials in Vietnam have
investigated over 300 I-600 petitions. This report presents a summary
of our findings.

Next Page »